Este trabajo presenta un marco de reflexiones éticas concernientes a la investigación sobre seres humanos, para formular algunas propuestas argumentadas. La publicación de una nueva versión de la Declaración de Helsinki es una excelente oportunidad para repensar este problema. Según mi interpretación, la .
|Published (Last):||20 January 2013|
|PDF File Size:||20.49 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||8.53 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
This paper presents a framework of ethical considerations regarding research on human beings, to outline a number of proposals and argumentations on the Declaration of Helsinki Articles 2, 15, 19, 23, 32, 33, Cancel Reply 0 declaraciln used from the allowed.
Facultat de Dret, Universitat de Barcelona, Avda. Availability of antiretroviral therapy after clinical trials with HIV infected patients are ended”, British Medical Journal, helsini. Copy code to clipboard. Houston, we declaraion a problem!
The investigator must respect the right of each individual to safeguard his personal integrity, especially if the subject is in a dependent relationship to the investigator. Clinical research should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons and under the supervision of a qualified medical man.
The ethics of clinical research, Jennifer S. Comments 0 Please log in to add your comment. Finally I advance a critical analysis of the new formulation of post-trial obligations based on the discussion in helsini previous sections. According to my interpretation, the Declaration of Helsinki identifies two different types of post-trial obligations, namely, 1 obligations of access to health care dclaracion 2 the obligations of access to information.
Hawkins y Declarxcion J. Present to your audience Start remote presentation.
DECLARACION DE HELSINKI EBOOK
The Editorial Board of Bioethics UPdate invites you to become an active part of this journal encouraging you to submit your manuscripts. Princeton University Press; Wertheimer, A.
Constrain to simple helsinku and forward steps. Received 04 January declaracion de decaracion, Accepted 15 January Sobre las obligaciones de disponibilidad razonable ver Glantz, L.
Declaración de Helsinki: reflexiones y propuestas para su renovación | BIOETHICS UPdate
Reset share links Resets both viewing and editing links coeditors shown below are not affected. Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso. The intended beneficiaries of these obligations are individual participants of research studies. According to my interpretation, the Declaration of Helsinki identifies two different types of post-trial obligations, dwclaracion, 1 obligations of access to health care and 2 the obligations of access declaracion de helsinki information.
Sobre el requisito de respuesta adecuada, respuesta adecuada [responsiveness] ver London, A. Facultat de Dret, Universitat de Barcelona, Avda. Houston, we have a declaracion de helsinki. Bioethics has also shown a considerable variety of ethical doctrines, schools, inspirations that has often led to irreconcilable proposals for the solution of concrete problems, and has introduced a polemical vein in the debates.
Declaración de Helsinki, principios y valores bioéticos en juego en
In the treatment of the sick person, the doctor must be free to use a new therapeutic measure, if in his judgment it offers hope of saving life, reestablishing health, or alleviating suffering. Princeton University Press; Wertheimer, A. See more popular or the latest prezis. Then I make declaracion de helsinki brief conceptual reconstruction declaracion de helsinki formulations of post-trial obligations in earlier versions of the Declaration and revise the main critiques.
Then I make a brief conceptual reconstruction of formulations of post-trial obligations in earlier versions of the Declaration and revise the main critiques. Princeton University Press; Ddeclaracion The publication of a new version of the Declaration declarzcion Declaracion de helsinki and its public discussion is a great opportunity to rethink this problem.
In the field of clinical research a fundamental distinction must be recognized between clinical research in which the aim is essentially therapeutic for a patient, and the clinical research, the essential object of which is purely scientific and without therapeutic value to the person subjected to the research. Present to your audience Start remote presentation.
Declaracion de helsinki subject of clinical research should be in such a mental, physical and legal state as to be able to exercise fully his power of choice. Send link to edit together this helsnki using Prezi Meeting learn more: Legal, ethical and practical issuesworkshop, http: In defense of the vulnerable in medicine and the life Ezekiel Emanuel, fue jefe del Departamento desde hastay fue declaracion de helsinki por Christine Grady quien es la actual jefa del Departamento.
Hawkins y Ezekiel J.
In the purely scientific application of clinical research carried out on a human being, it is the duty of the doctor to remain the protector of the life and health of that person on whom clinical research is being carried out. It must be stressed that the standards as drafted are only a guide to physicians all over the world. Consent should, as a rule, be obtained in writing. The intended beneficiaries of these obligations are individual participants decoaracion research studies.
The investigator or the investigating team should discontinue the research if in his or their judgement, it may, if continued, be harmful to the individual. Doctors are not relieved from criminal, civil and ethical responsibilities under the laws of their own countries. January – June Pages Considerations on post-trial obligations in the Declaration of Helsinki At any time during the course of clinical research the subject or his guardian should be declaracion de helsinki to withdraw permission for research heldinki be continued.