36, X. 37, X. 38, March , CFG, Blanket statements of conformance are unacceptable for any test results. 39, SIGNATURE, TITLE, DATE. PSW. AIAG Production Part Approval process PPAP 4th Edition Approval of Requirements Team of PPAP Submitted PSW Customer Process Design Requirements I. Hello, in the pdf I can see a new revision from PSW. Have a look at the previous post “AIAG PPAP (Production Part Approval Process).

Author: Dusar Arashicage
Country: Greece
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Art
Published (Last): 13 March 2006
Pages: 227
PDF File Size: 3.13 Mb
ePub File Size: 8.8 Mb
ISBN: 696-7-94144-641-5
Downloads: 58259
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Mikat

The organization shall record the change level, drawing date, organization name and part number on all auxiliary documents e.

AIAG Production Part Approval process PPAP 4th Edition | G C –

These are not necessarily intended to be Special Characteristics. TE is tlie agreed upon number of pasts produced in a planned time period to meet customer assembly or manufacturing plant production volume requirements – with consideration of other product mix and machine availability.

It is important that adequate quantities of parts be manufactured during this run to confirm the quality and capability of production process at rate prior to full production.

Material test results may be presented in any convenient format.

The organization shall review and update, as necessary, all applicable items in the PAP file to reflect the production process, regardless of whether or not ajag customer requests a formal submission.

Examples include the presence or absence of a required label, the installation of all required fasteners.


Unless approved by the authorized customer representative, attribute data are not acceptable for PPAP submissions. These should be listed and relevant documents included or referred to. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources.

Additional customer specific requirements may be imposed by particular clients vehicle manufacturers and incorporated in the purchasing contracts. Records shown may be in various media and in various storage locations. High is defined as – Repeated failures Moderate is defined as – Occasional failures Low is defined as – Relatively few failures F.

Part Submission Warrant (PSW)

Specifications should not be confused with control limits which represent “the voice of the process. SUPPLIERS are providers of production materials, or production or service parts, assemblies, heat treating, welding, painting, plating or other finishing services directly to an organization supplying the OEM or other customers requiring this document. CpI,does not include the effect of process variability between the subgroups.

The organization shall obtain customer concurrence on the index for estimating initial process capability prior to submission. Tool Purchase Order Number: When this design record is used, the organization is responsible for obtaining a drawing to convey results of dimensional inspection.

In order to determine with certainty which items intlst be included, consult the design record, e. This does not mean the product being presented is under serial conditions but just states with evidence the current status.

Unlike Cpk,Ppkis not limited to the variation within subgroups. Planned Date of Implementation: The Customer drawing revision level and date.

TOP Related  6ES7307-1KA02-0AA0 PDF

Production part approval process – Wikipedia

Upon satisfactory completion of all required criteria, the organization shall record the required information on the AAR. Similar processes have experienced repeated failures. Check the submission items if a level 4 is requested. For example, percent solids and viscosity of a bulk coating which impacts the final coating’s film build attribute, may be pssw by the customer’s mix room percent solvent reduction. Dimensional results typically do not apply to bulk materials.

Production part approval process

These parts or materials submitted for production past approval are to be verified by the organization as meeting all specified requirements from the design record. Enter alphanumeric master identification not used by Ford. Each part must have a Control Plan, but in many cases, “family” Control Plans can apply to a number of parts produced using a xiag process. This interaction is especially significant when bulk materials undergo chemical or physical transfoimation s.

This benefits the supplier and the manufacturer by giving the part a more human name and decreasing the chance of errors for example calling the part QNCAN could easily be mixed up if multiple PPAPs were being discussed.

The ID of the manufacturers purchase order Weight i.